ANN: Four modules for RDFa and HTML

[Toby Inkster]

On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 11:03 -0800, Tim Allwine wrote:
> #   Failed test 'XML seems to have correct literal value (with 
> ec14n)'
> #   at t/xmlliteral.t line 37.
> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 7.
> t/xmlliteral.t .... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> Failed 1/7 subtests 

This is probably not an error of vital importance.

The RDFa syntax specification is very particular about how XML literals
are stringified - they need to have xml:lang attributes inserted in
various places, and be canonicalised using XML-EC14N. It's this
particularness where the test is failing (it seems).

If you're not doing anything especially fiddly involving rdf:XMLLiteral
literals then you can just force install it and things will be fine.

Which version of libxml are you using? I'm currently on libxml 2.6.31
and XML::LibXML 1.69. I'm also using Perl 5.10.1.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail at tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>