ANN: Four modules for RDFa and HTML
Toby Inkster
mail at tobyinkster.co.uk
Sat Dec 5 15:30:38 CET 2009
> On Friday 4. December 2009 21:08:45 Toby Inkster wrote:
>
>> The RDFa syntax specification is very particular about how XML literals
>> are stringified - they need to have xml:lang attributes inserted in
>> various places, and be canonicalised using XML-EC14N. It's this
>> particularness where the test is failing (it seems).
>
> This test is not failing for me, could it have something to do with
> RDF::Trine::Node::Literal::XML?
The test case doesn't use RDF::Trine::Node::Literal::XML.
I think it's more likely a libxml version issue. Tim is using a fairly old
version of libxml (2.6.16) and http://xmlsoft.org/news.html indicates
several canonicalisation fixes in releases since then.
Anyone here know enough about Test::More to make this test skippable based
on libxml version?
-Toby
More information about the Dev
mailing list