RDF Parser / Serializer plans

[Gregory Williams]

On Dec 17, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:

>> Great. I've been meaning to hook up your RDFa parser to RDF::Query so
>> that doing things like "FROM <foo.html>" would work as expected. This
>> would be a big step in that direction.
> 
> Great stuff! Just beware of ISSUE-49: 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/49
> I think the above is an argument in favor of the graph being an information 
> resource.

Yeah, I'm not sure what to think of this, but I'm not convinced that the graph shouldn't be an information resource... it's what I'd expect, but am open to other ideas of what a graph actually is. Will try to track issue 49, but in the mean time I'd like to hook up the RDFa stuff because it certainly seems useful :)

>> Thrilled you're working on this, but not sure about the name... Extras
>> sounds funny to my ears. I understand the desire to have them in a
>> group instead of having 10 new packages, but seems somewhat
>> un-CPAN-like. Anyone have thoughts on better names? Or maybe I could
>> convince you to have separate packages and we could introduce a CPAN
>> Bundle for extra parsers/serializers? Or just bundle it all into
>> RDF::Trine (if they don't introduce lots of new dependancies)? Dunno...
> 
> +1 to that.

+1 to what, exactly? The whole "dunno" thing? Or a specific thing I suggested?

.g