Hackathon project: Update RDF::Helper

Kjetil Kjernsmo kjetil at kjernsmo.net
Mon Apr 12 20:22:28 CEST 2010


On Monday 12. April 2010 16:49:52 Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > The former is based entirely on RDF::Trine, the latter
> > implements a bridge layer to RDF::Redland and RDF::Core, which is also
> > done by RDF::Trine.
> 
> That isn't done by RDF::Trine. I only implement native stores at this
>  point (and also a read-only SPARQL-based "store"). 

Ah, yes, sorry. What I was trying to get at is whether such bridges should 
be a part of the low-level API, as I believe it should.

>  RDF::Query, on the
>  other hand, does have the same sort of bridge layer and can interact
>  with RDF::Trine, RDF::Redland, and RDF::Core. However, since RDF::Trine
>  is always required, I've considered dropping this bridge layer and
>  instead writing RDF::Trine store classes for Redland 

Right!

>  (and maybe
>  RDF::Core, but honestly I'm not all that motivated to continue
>  supporting that module).

I would be +1 on dropping support for it, it doesn't seem to give us that 
much, and if we have a clean layer, if someone decides to put it back in, 
they could.

> Is there a wiki somewhere where we could consolidate the list of things
>  we'd like to work on next week? Having a short bulleted list somewhere
>  would help me try to keep it all straight.

I guess we can use yours for now. I haven't set up a wiki myself either. 

Kjetil
-- 
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kjetil at kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/


More information about the Dev mailing list