N3 model in Trine
greg at evilfunhouse.com
Wed Jun 9 20:41:53 CEST 2010
On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
>> Do people think this would be worth the work? Greg, do you know of any
>> gotchas that someone might encounter trying to get this to fly? (I
>> imagine the DBI Stores would need a bit of reworking if a new kind of
>> Node was added for graph literals.
> Yes, graph literals would be a pain, but there's also code in the DBI store to optimize the number of joins required and its all based on the assumption that the data model is RDF (no literals as subjects/predicates and no blanks as predicates).
I should say that changing the DBI store is something I hope never to do. It's a tangled mess of code that would probably be easier to rewrite than to fully understand or update at this point :)
More information about the Dev